[easyazon_link identifier=”1587434016″ locale=”US” tag=”douloschristo-20″]For the Life of the World: Theology That Makes a Difference [/easyazon_link]
Miroslav Volf /
Matthew Croasmun
Brazos Press
The question of what makes life worth living is more vital now than ever. In today’s pluralistic, postsecular world, universal values are dismissed as mere matters of private opinion, and the question of what constitutes flourishing life–for ourselves, our neighbors, and the planet as a whole–is neglected in our universities, our churches, and our culture at large. Although we increasingly have technology to do almost anything, we have little sense of what is truly worth accomplishing.
In this provocative new contribution to public theology, world-renowned theologian Miroslav Volf (named “America’s New Public Intellectual” by Scot McKnight on his Jesus Creed blog) and Matthew Croasmun explain that the intellectual tools needed to rescue us from our present malaise and meet our new cultural challenge are the tools of theology. A renewal of theology is crucial to help us articulate compelling visions of the good life, find our way through the maze of contested questions of value, and answer the fundamental question of what makes life worth living.
[easyazon_image align=”center” height=”500″ identifier=”0198813864″ locale=”US” src=”https://englewoodreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/51MTfx8H9oL.jpg” tag=”douloschristo-20″ width=”353″]
[easyazon_link identifier=”0198813864″ locale=”US” tag=”douloschristo-20″]Atonement (Oxford Studies in Analytic Theology)[/easyazon_link]
Eleonore Stump
Oxford UP
The doctrine of the atonement is the distinctive doctrine of Christianity. Over the course of many centuries of reflection, highly diverse interpretations of the doctrine have been proposed. In the context of this history of interpretation, Eleonore Stump considers the doctrine afresh with philosophical care. Whatever exactly the atonement is, it is supposed to include a solution to the problems of the human condition, especially its guilt and shame. Stump canvasses the major interpretations of the doctrine that attempt to explain this solution and argues that all of them have serious shortcomings. In their place, she argues for an interpretation that is both novel and yet traditional and that has significant advantages over other interpretations, including Anselm’s well-known account of the doctrine. In the process, she also discusses love, union, guilt, shame, forgiveness, retribution, punishment, shared attention, mind-reading, empathy, and various other issues in moral psychology and ethics. |