[easyazon_image align=”left” height=”333″ identifier=”0801097975″ locale=”US” src=”http://englewoodreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/51Z2BLjkHXL.jpg” tag=”douloschristo-20″ width=”229″]Reframing our
Theology and Evangelism
A Review of
Salvation by Allegiance Alone: Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus the King.
Hardback: Baker Academic, 2017.
Buy Now: [ [easyazon_link identifier=”0801097975″ locale=”US” tag=”douloschristo-20″]Amazon[/easyazon_link] ] [ [easyazon_link identifier=”B01LY8X68O” locale=”US” tag=”douloschristo-20″]Kindle[/easyazon_link] ]
Reviewed by Danny Yencich
Matthew Bates’s recent Salvation by Allegiance Alone is a welcome book. It is useful—vital, even—for Christians of any traditional or denominational stripe grappling with the Gospel.
The book, which is clearly aimed at a mixed audience of laity and students, forwards a simple but important thesis: contemporary Christianity has, for the most part, gotten it wrong when it comes to “belief, faith, works, salvation, heaven, and the gospel” itself (2). Bates’s argument hinges on a fresh take on the first item in that list— “belief” (pistis). Whenever the Greek term pistis appears in the New Testament with reference to eternal salvation, Bates suggests that allegiance, not “belief,” “is the best macro-term available to us that can describe what God requires from us for eternal salvation” (5). Thus, “it is by grace you have been saved through allegiance” to Jesus the Christ (Eph 2:8, Bates’s translation, 4). This is a marked departure from the standard rendering of this and most other NT instances of the term pistis, which is to say: Bates has picked a fight with a lot of people. His argument, however, is robust and demands a close reading from anyone who would immediately dismiss the thesis out of hand.