[easyazon-image align=”left” asin=”0830827226″ locale=”us” height=”333″ src=”http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51aSo9zokPL.jpg” width=”222″ alt=”John Nugent” ]The book review that has gotten the most attention on our website by far is John Nugent’s review of Peter Leithart’s Defending Constantine.
We also published an initial response by Leithart.
The ensuing conversation inspired an issue of The Mennonite Quarterly Review and the new book [easyazon-link asin=”1610978196″ locale=”us”]Constantine Revisited: Leithart, Yoder, and the Constantinian Debate[/easyazon-link] (Wipf and Stock, 2013).
John Nugent offers here further thoughts on this conversation about Constantine.
DIFFERENT BUT NOT EQUALLY DEFENSIBLE:
A RESPONSE TO LEITHART’S DEFENSE OF DEFENDING CONSTANTINE